Preaching from the Drudge Report

“the momentum of that kind of appeal is to set the preacher’s imperative in the context of…the latest article on Drudge Report.”

From The Christian Post comes an article about a recent Rick Warren sermon.  Warren tells us:

You don’t need to apologize for voting for a Christian worldview which stands up for the sanctity of life, the sanctity of sex and the sanctity of marriage. You don’t need to apologize for that because everybody votes what they believe.

Rather than delve into all the current issues related to life, sex, and marriage, let’s just consider the language Warren uses.  But first, let’s consider the language he doesn’t use.  What he could have said was something like this:

You don’t need to apologize for having your voting guided by the sixth and seventh commandments.

Obviously that approach isn’t as eloquent and may have had the Saddleback congregation leafing through their Bibles to figure out what the sixth and seventh commandments are, but let’s put that to the side as well.  Instead, what is the difference between these two types of appeals?

Now let’s look at what Warren didn’t do in this quote: refer to the Bible.  If he had referred to the Bible, there would at least be the form of deriving his exhortation from the scriptures. That kind of reference would direct attention to the commandments and their scriptural explanations. If some of the pewsitters were catechized, they might have even thought “The sixth commandment forbiddeth the taking away of our own life, or the life of our neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto.”  The momentum of the “commandment” language is to drive the hearer to consider what the scriptures have to say about the matter, what the church’s shared understanding of the scriptures have to say about the matter, or even to discover that they don’t say anything at all about the matter.  It might also stir up some thoughts about the uses of law we see in the scriptures – as the civil law of Israel, as an instrument convicting of our need for a Savior, and as a guide for the Christian life.  In short, replacing “worldview” with a scriptural reference(s) puts the matter in a distinct and helpful context.

This isn’t a critique of Warren as such, and presumably he makes frequent reference to the Bible.  If so, that’s because it’s pretty much the job of a preacher to tell us not about sociology, archeology, or philosophy, but, rather, to tell us what God has revealed in the scriptures.  But “worldview” isn’t the scriptures, so the preacher isn’t telling us what God has revealed. By grounding his message in “worldview,” the preacher has left his primary task and is telling us about something other than the scriptures.

As to what that something else is, “worldview” points to what is now a kind of pop-philosophy.  It tells us, for example, that there is a certain coherence and consistency among basic thought categories. Its basic structure was set forth by Kant, entered Reformed Christianity through Kuyper, and has since entered evangelicalism through men like Francis Schaeffer and Charles Colson. And it is evolving; one wonders how Kuyper might view today’s evangelical version of his project.  Whatever it was and whatever it has become, it is not the Word of God.

Then, worldview is something more than a statement about how thoughts hang together. Listen to when and how it is used, and you will see that “worldview” has action embedded in it.  It has become a trumpet call to do things to change our culture and politics. And the momentum of that kind of appeal is to set the preacher’s imperative in the context of political parties, conservatism vs. liberalism, and the latest article on Drudge Report.  Again, without commenting on the best place to be in that context, it is assuredly not a context as suitable for discerning God’s Word as the context invited by a scriptural appeal.

Advertisements

12 Comments

Filed under Worldview

12 responses to “Preaching from the Drudge Report

  1. Reblogged this on Literate Comments and commented:
    Excellent post.

  2. Richard

    Yes, very thoughtful, and very good. And the cynic in me tells me this common sense will be ignored since we all dig trumpet calls and culture wars and “winning” at all costs.

    • Cynicism, the occupational hazard of the attorney. But we do have an inside track on understanding depravity, so there’s always that.

      • Richard

        Believe it or not, in the federal employment law practice, I’ve found I have competition for biggest cynic: those in our EEO office who handle federal sector discrimination complaints. Boy, oh, boy, talk about depravity and denial of responsibility–you should hear some of our filers. It’s one reason I get tired of culture warriors–they sound like some of our complainants.

  3. Wow, Mike, worldview and conspiratorialism in the same seminar. I may have to attend. I’ll be on the knife’s edge between fascination and repulsion.

    • But on the bright side, Richard, it’s nice to have an IRS-Magistrate with a robust doctrine of the spirituality of the church, even if the pastors don’t. Maybe the IRS should teach a class in some of our seminaries.

      It will be interesting to see if there will be any enforcement. Not in this election season, I wouldn’t think, but if Obama gets re-elected, who knows?

  4. Richard

    The IRS-Magistrate has a robust doctrine of the spirituality of the church, while pastors don’t. Nice. I doubt there will be any enforcement. And the pastors will declare victory while the cause of Christ suffers.

  5. Just stumbled upon your blog this morning. Good stuff. This is a great post. You’ve articulated well the thoughts that went through my head when I heard this news clip on a secular radio station. I have followed the whole “worldview” philosophy with much interest. While I hold to a 2K theology, Schaeffer made so much sense to me in my young 20’s when he exposed the whole idea of presuppositions to me for the first time. It’s interesting to even think of the presuppositions of a pastor who preaches a worldview argument over a Scriptural one from the pulpit…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s